![]() |
|||||||||
|
Pokeka alternative access |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
TRAMPERS
Humphries hut Maungarau Omaru river Otaraheke hut Pokeka Pokeka alternative Puteore Tahupo Train's DAY TRIPPERS Kapara Mangawhio lakes Maumahaki reserve Ngamatapouri Pungarehu rapids Rotokohu wetlands Waitotara R.mouth Waverley inland Weraweraonga
MAPS
|
The track to Pokeka at present leaves the
end of the Waitotara valley road, and follows a paper road through
farmland to a forest boundary some 5 - 6 km away. Unfortunately the access
at the road end is controlled by the farmer who runs a tourist hunting
venture. Because of this he denies all access to hunters, and
denies access to trampers when he has "clients". Yet the DoC publication
giving the Recreation Opportunities Review decisions of this area state
that this "landowner has advised that existing access over his land
remains available" and give this as one reason for not relocating this
track to our Conservation estate adjacent. The other reason for not
relocating the track is that it "would be seen as provocative to the
adjacent landowner who has concerns about hunters trespassing / poaching
and stock disturbance." (p 36). DoC Wanganui acknowledges that this farmer grazes DoC land, including the ecologically valuable Rotokohu wetlands, with no licence. He has been allowed to farm deer on the boundary of a forest that, until recently, had not been invaded by this particular pest. Yet DoC don't want to provoke him by removing Pokeka track from his land (it is a public road!) and relocating it in adjacent DoC land!!! Here is a chance to have hunters control the deer that invade this part of the forest and DoC is not interested. One has to wonder what is going on here. Therefore it was perhaps not surprising that in the original Recreation
Opportunities proposals, DoC decided to close this track. With the huge
public submissions against this proposal though, the next decision was to
simply not maintain the track. (It hasn't been maintained for ages
anyway!) Because this was such a contentious issue, the final decision was
to seek community maintenance. Sounds fine. But newspaper articles since
the release of the final proposals have DoC Whanganui making it quite
clear that without community maintenance, the track AND Pokeka hut AND
Maungarau hut would go, and no shelters would be built to replace them.
The official DoC publication does not state this requirement for the huts.
Again, what is going on here?
|
||||||||
![]() an alternative track to Trains along this ridge
|
|||||||||
![]() "farmed" Deer - on DoC land |
|||||||||
![]() a decent sized kahikatea tree |
|||||||||
|
DoC land providing free grazing so why not an easier access too? |
|||||||||
|
another view |
|||||||||